Quoting Simon Wilson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I have a GA-P35-DS3P motherboard, with an E6850 Core 2 Duo
processor. The machine is running CentOS 5.3. It has an it8718
sensors chip.
I have installed lm_sensors 2.10.8 and the kmod-it87 driver from
elrepo.org (needed because of the 'old' CentOS 2.6.18 kernel), and
all is basically working. A clear sensors output reads:
it8718-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
in0: +1.12 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
in1: +1.87 V (min = +1.71 V, max = +1.89 V)
in2: +3.22 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.47 V)
in3: +2.91 V (min = +2.83 V, max = +3.12 V)
in4: +0.85 V (min = +2.85 V, max = +3.15 V) ALARM
in5: +0.05 V (min = +0.85 V, max = +1.09 V) ALARM
in6: +0.03 V (min = +1.12 V, max = +1.28 V) ALARM
in7: +3.12 V (min = +2.85 V, max = +3.15 V)
in8: +3.30 V
fan1: 1424 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
fan2: 0 RPM (min = 3994 RPM)
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
fan4: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM)
temp1: +30°C (low = +10°C, high = +60°C) sensor = thermistor
temp2: +26°C (low = +10°C, high = +70°C) sensor = diode
temp3: -2°C (low = +127°C, high = +127°C) sensor = disabled
vid: +0.000 V
Using the configuration from
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Configurations/Gigabyte/G33-DS3R
which also uses the 8718 I am now at this:
it8718-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
Vcore: +1.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM
Vram: +1.87 V (min = +1.71 V, max = +1.89 V)
+3.3V: +3.22 V (min = +3.14 V, max = +3.47 V)
+5V: +4.89 V (min = +4.76 V, max = +5.24 V)
+12V: +12.48 V (min = +11.39 V, max = +12.61 V)
Vbat: +3.30 V
CPU Fan: 1421 RPM (min = 600 RPM)
NBr Temp: +30°C (low = +10°C, high = +60°C) sensor = thermistor
CPU Temp: +26°C (low = +10°C, high = +70°C) sensor = diode
vid: +0.000 V
Which is perfect apart from one thing - the 0.000 V value for VID,
which is then also throwing off Vcore (in0) as that is calculated
from VID (>95 <105%).
Can anyone help me work out why VID is reading 0.000?
Thanks
This is the same issue as noted in this thread here:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-January/025018.html
Setting /sys/class/hwmon/hwmon0/device/vrm to 100 instead of 110
"fixes" this issue. Or I should say, it means I get a value - 1.088 V
- at VID. Whether it is right or not... ?
Running "isadump -k 0x87,0x01,0x55,0x55 0x2e 0x2f 7" as asked in that
thread gives me:
WARNING! Running this program can cause system crashes, data loss and worse!
I will probe address register 0x2e and data register 0x2f.
Probing bank 7 using bank register 0x07.
Continue? [Y/n] y
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 87 18 04 10 00 80 df 3f 43 89 00 00 1d 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
60: 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70: 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c2 00 00 00 00 00 00
c0: 80 1d 3f 43 09 00 00 00 00 19 00 03 08 00 00 00
d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7e
f0: 10 40 00 00 00 00 11 00 00 00 00 00 3f 00 00 00
From reading that thread I wonder if this is a version of hwmon-vid issue?
--
Simon Wilson
www.simonandkate.net
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
