On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 10:35:25AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:54:08 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:45:46 +0200, Andre Prendel wrote: > > > Hi Jean, > > > > > > here is another patch series cleaning up the sensors deamon. > > > > > > Some patches fixing some coding style issues, breaking long lines and > > > making code more readable by the refactoring of big functions. > > > > > > Another one removes some needless casts and there is a patch > > > converting the HTML code (CGI script) generated by sensord to lower > > > case. So we're closer to XHTML. Unfortunately the output of rrdcgi > > > isn't very strict. > > > > > > With this series I've finished the cleanup caused by the coding style > > > conversion. During the work I saw some things to fix, so I will go on > > > hacking the deamon. Now I hope the code is more readable and the > > > maintenance and development should be easier. BTW I don't like some > > > details of the implementation (see notes in patch 4/5). Some stuff > > > looks needless. Further I would like it if the deamon would be closer > > > to the sensors console tool. This would ease maintenance too. So you > > > see what I'm going to do in the future. > > > > Very nice. Thanks a lot for working on this, this was very needed. > > > > > This here is post 3.1.1 material. Maybe we could make a stable branch > > > 3.1.1? Otherwise we wait with the commits until 3.1.1 is released. > > > > Let's just wait until 3.1.1 is released, it is less than 1 week away > > now and nobody reviewed your patches yet anyway. I don't think it makes > > much sense to create branches for 1-week SVN freeze periods. And > > anyway, during these periods, we should all be testing the code rather > > that developing new stuff ;) > > Andre, any news from these sensord patches? We spent quite some time on > them, and they looked promising, it would be a pity if they are finally > lost. Hi Jean, no news so far :( To much other work since I changed the employer and maybe I've been a bit lazy lately :) Ok, I will reserve some time next week to revise the patches. BTW I did some work on the DMI configuration topic a few month ago. I don't forgot this one. But it's far from being ready. So far there's just a bash script for fetching the configs from lm-sensors.org and another one looking for DMI data and suitable config and copy this one. Is it worth to post this prototype to have something to discuss or should I better finish the work? I think I will post it :) Thanks, Andre > -- > Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
