On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:54:08 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:45:46 +0200, Andre Prendel wrote: > > Hi Jean, > > > > here is another patch series cleaning up the sensors deamon. > > > > Some patches fixing some coding style issues, breaking long lines and > > making code more readable by the refactoring of big functions. > > > > Another one removes some needless casts and there is a patch > > converting the HTML code (CGI script) generated by sensord to lower > > case. So we're closer to XHTML. Unfortunately the output of rrdcgi > > isn't very strict. > > > > With this series I've finished the cleanup caused by the coding style > > conversion. During the work I saw some things to fix, so I will go on > > hacking the deamon. Now I hope the code is more readable and the > > maintenance and development should be easier. BTW I don't like some > > details of the implementation (see notes in patch 4/5). Some stuff > > looks needless. Further I would like it if the deamon would be closer > > to the sensors console tool. This would ease maintenance too. So you > > see what I'm going to do in the future. > > Very nice. Thanks a lot for working on this, this was very needed. > > > This here is post 3.1.1 material. Maybe we could make a stable branch > > 3.1.1? Otherwise we wait with the commits until 3.1.1 is released. > > Let's just wait until 3.1.1 is released, it is less than 1 week away > now and nobody reviewed your patches yet anyway. I don't think it makes > much sense to create branches for 1-week SVN freeze periods. And > anyway, during these periods, we should all be testing the code rather > that developing new stuff ;) Andre, any news from these sensord patches? We spent quite some time on them, and they looked promising, it would be a pity if they are finally lost. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
