On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > ?struct spi_driver {
> > +?????const struct spi_device_id *id_table;
> > +?????int?????????????????????(*probe_id)(struct spi_device *spi,
> > +????????????????????????????????????? ? ?const struct spi_device_id *id);
>
> how about leaving it at just probe and have either a call or a field
> in the device that you can look at to see if this was a new style of
> call?
>
> > ??????int?????????????????????(*probe)(struct spi_device *spi);
For the record, if this is going to happen I think the
appropriate long-term solution is to have probe() take
the device_id just as it does with other busses.
Of course that involves changing *every* SPI driver...
and I'd rather not do that quite yet.
