[PATCH v2 5/7] sensord: Refactoring of loadConfig()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 May 2009 11:07:20 +0200, Andre Prendel wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:21:47AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I mean:
> > 
> > <minus><tab><tab><tab>sensors_cleanup();
> > <plus><space><space><tab><tab><tab>sensors_cleanup();
> > 
> > The two spaces shouldn't be there. As a matter of fact, the effective
> > content of this line doesn't change, so it shouldn't show up in the
> > diff... unless there are invisible whitespace changes.
> 
> Ah, now I got it, thanks. I didn't see the two spaces (have trusted the
> Emacs indentation). I'll fix that before committing.
> 
> BTW, how do you review patches? In your mailclient or in external
> tool? Sometimes diffs are very difficult to read.

Depends on how complex the patch is. For simple patches, in my mail
client. For more complex patches, I save them, and test them using
quilt. "quilt diff" adds color to the patches, this makes them easier
to read. If the patch changes a lot of code, I often open the complete
source file to double-check the new code looks good, and also build the
code and look for warnings.

-- 
Jean Delvare



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux