On Mon, 11 May 2009 14:57:57 +0200, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Monday 11 May 2009 13:17:22 you wrote: > > Hi Hubert, > > > > On Sat, 9 May 2009 12:27:09 +0200, Hubert Kario wrote: > > > Hello everybody! > > > I've created a mainboard specific configuration for Gigabyte EP45-DS3P: > > > > > > === snip === > > > chip "it87-*" "it8712-*" "it8716-*" "it8718-*" "it8720-*" > > > > Which actual IT87xxF chip does the EP45-DS3P have? > IT8720, I'll check when I'll be able to how it's visible by lspci/sensors, I > don't know when it will be though, maybe today evening, maybe in a week's time OK, no hurry. lspci won't show anything as this is not a PCI device. sensors-detect should tell you. > > > label in0 "Vcore" > > > label in1 "Vram" > > > label in2 "+3.3V" > > > > > > label in3 "+5V" > > > # Standard resistor > > > compute in3 @ * ( 6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1) > > > > > > ignore in4 > > > > > > label in5 "+12V" > > > # that's a bit weird, as the value (29.6) is close to typical resistor, > > > # but it does give proper results (in line with what a multimeter > > > # and BIOS show) > > > > Could be that the 10 isn't correct. Not that it really matters > > though... what matters is that the scaling factor is correct. > > > > > compute in5 @ * (29.6/10+1), @ / (29.6/10+1) > > > > > > ignore in6 > > > > > > # not sure about this one > > > label in7 "5VSB" > > > compute in7 @ * (6.8/10+1), @ / (6.8/10+1) > > > > > > label in8 "Vbat" > > > > > > # labels are after the ones printed on the mainboard > > > label fan1 "CPU_FAN" > > > label fan2 "SYS_FAN2" > > > label fan3 "PWR_FAN" > > > label fan4 "SYS_FAN1" > > > > These labels are ugly. What about: > > yes, I know, but these are the exact ones that are printed on the mainboard... > and besides CPU_FAN, they can be connected to any fan one wishes (northbridge > is passively cooled in this mainboard) This is true of all (almost) motherboards out there. Still, we want to present the inputs in a user-friendly way for users sticking to the planned usage of the fan headers. Presumably, anyone able to diverge from this will be able to adjust the configuration file accordingly. > > > > label fan1 "CPU Fan" > > label fan2 "Sys Fan 2" > > label fan3 "Power Fan" > > label fan4 "Sys Fan 2" > > > > > label temp1 "Sys Temp" > > > label temp2 "Tcase Temp" > > > > Why "Tcase" and not just "Case"? > because it's the Tcase temp of a CPU (temperature of an IHS) > > I bet "Case Temp" would be read as ambient temperature by most people > (temperature inside the computer case), making it Tcase should clear the > confusion, especially when after putting "tcase temp" to google one does > recive "C2Q/C2D Temp Guide" as first result and "Tcase/Tjunction/Temp > question" as second Ah, OK. Then why not just "CPU Temp"? This would be much clearer. It's not like you have other CPU temperature sensors on the chip. > > > > > ignore temp3 > > > === snip === > > > > Yes it does, thanks for your contribution! > np > > BTW, I couldn't use "compute" with "Core 0" and "Core 1" labels (I wanted to > calibrate my core temperatures) > line: > > compute "Core 0" @ +3, @ -3 > > was completely ignored... Compute statements take symbolic names, not labels, as their first parameter. Try: compute temp1 @ +3, @ -3 -- Jean Delvare
