Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:20:05 +0100, Gabriel C wrote: >> Gabriel C wrote: >> >>> Jean Delvare wrote: >>>> OK, thanks for reporting. I have just committed a fix to sensors-detect >>>> so that it will differentiate between LM96000/PC8374L (have sensors) >>>> and WPCD377I (no sensors) on the SMBus. Please give it a try: >>>> http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect >>> >>> Thanks , I will test when I'm home and report back. >> It does work for me , the new output is : >> >> ... >> >> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM96000 or PC8374L'... No >> ... >> >> Probing for `Winbond WPCD377I'... Yes >> (confidence 7, not a hardware monitoring chip) > > As expected. Thanks for reporting. > >> .. >> >> Jean it is possible these chips have something to do with Intel's QST ? > > No, they do not. The idea (as far as I understand it) is that these > boards have Super-I/O chips with reduced features (no hardware > monitoring) because the south bridge (ICH8+) has QST support. So you > need AMT/QST support for hardware monitoring features. > Ah ok. I do have AMT ( heci linux driver ) but open source QST SDK is not yet released :/ However according to http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/manageability-software-development/topic/54851/reply/74068/ with an NDA one could get a copy of the SDK even yet. Gabriel
