On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:33:11 -0500, Christopher Montgomery wrote: > > Thanks for reporting. Apparently the pin usage bits have inverted logic > > between the W83627EHG and the W83667HG. Can you please test the > > following patch? It should fix your problem. > > I'll check tonight. > > > That's more surprising. How exactly did you attempt to set sane values? > > If you edited /etc/sensors3.conf, please remember that it takes a > > "sensors -s" to write the new limits to the chip. > > Ah, that was certainly my mistake. > > Are somewhat scattershot defaults somewhat to be expected? Yes, this is very frequent. -- Jean Delvare
