2008/12/3 Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org>: > Hi all, > > Over the past few days, I have been working a lot on sensors-detect. I > implemented ideas I had exposed months ago but did not have the time to > implement back then: > > id summary > 2322 The probe order in sensors-detect doesn't make sense > 2325 sensors-detect: Drop support for Linux 2.4 > 2327 sensors-detect: Fix the bus numbering prediction magic > 2328 sensors-detect: Get the bus driver names from the kernel > 2329 sensors-detect: Unload drivers which we loaded ourselves > > I also made a huge amount of cleanups (including a complete > reindentation of the source code), reducing the size of the > sensors-detect script from 185 kB to roughly 145 kB. > > With so many changes, both in functionality and implementation, I > expect some fallouts. I tested my work on several machines already, but > there are so many possible combinations of devices that it is rather > unlikely that I managed to get everything right. > > So, I would like users to give a try to the latest version of > sensors-detect and report if it works fine for them or not. You can get > the latest version of sensors-detect using the following svn command: > > svn export http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0/prog/detect/sensors-detect > > Alternatively, you can get a copy from trac: > http://www.lm-sensors.org/browser/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0/prog/detect/sensors-detect?format=txt > > The behavior should be essentially the same as before, with the > difference that probes are done in reverse order (CPU, Super I/O, ISA, > SMBus), and ISA and SMBus probes default to no if a working Super I/O > was found (as was discussed on the list before [1].) > > [1] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-May/023056.html > > Thanks, > -- > Jean Delvare > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors > Hi Jean, Here is what I have with your version: Driver `it87': * ISA bus, address 0xe80 Chip `ITE IT8720F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) Driver `to-be-written': * Chip `AMD K10 thermal sensors' (confidence: 9) And here is what I had with the previous one: Driver `it87' (should be inserted): Detects correctly: * ISA bus, address 0xe80 Chip `ITE IT8720 Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) Driver `k8temp' (should be inserted): Detects correctly: * Chip `AMD K10 thermal sensors' (confidence: 9) I'm not 100% sur why I had a K8 before and a K10 with this new version. I remember that I have apply a patch in the kernel to handle Phenom internal sensors, but since this is kernel related, I think it should have no impact on the sensors-detect script. I will try to install and compile a brand next 2.6.27.7 kernel and retest. JM
