Hi Linus, On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Robert Hancock wrote: > > Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > > > 2) This patch is broken. > > > > You didn't indicate what was wrong with the patch. > > Yes. Leaving everybody wondering whether it's just an opinionated > expression of the former problem, or whether there is a real and > understandable reason why it was NACK'ed. I guess Mark assumed that everybody had read the discussion thread Rene referenced, where I explained why his patch was broken: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/23/175 -- Jean Delvare
