On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:41:29 +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:15:51 +0200, Gabriel C wrote: > >> Luca what do you think about creating a proper patch for the driver too and send it over to > >> Greg to be included in his linux-staging tree ? I think that way it will get more testing. > > > > Don't know which Greg you're thinking of? > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman > > >This is an ACPI-based > > hardware monitoring driver, so it would go to either the ACPI folks or > > (IMHO better) to the hwmon folks (i.e. the lm-sensors list). I agree > > that having a proper patch would be nice (but I also want to say that I > > will not have the time to review the driver myself.) > > > > > Yes sure but from what I understand linux-staging[1] tree holds not_yet__really_ready_to_merge > drivers , filesystems and such. I don't think it does matter it is an ACPI driver. > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/10/329 Ah, I didn't know about this new kernel tree, thanks for the pointer. I get what you meant now. -- Jean Delvare
