Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:36:46 -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> +energy[1-*]_input Instantaneous energy use > > This doesn't make sense to me. Energy is a quantity, it exists > independently of time. An "instantaneous energy use" only makes sense > if you tell in what (presumably very small) amount of time the energy > was used... and then what you are measuring is not an energy but a > power, for which we already have an interface. Please clarify. I agree. May I suggest "cumulative energy use"? Wes Felter - wesley at felter.org
