Hans, I got your mail - we were a little out of sync. Around 7:00pm EDT I should have completed your suggestions - with great expectations I might add. Thanks, James, Note: I saw the patch messages too. I may try both if needed. I don't have DDR3 memory, so I'm thinking I may not benefit from the patch - but I have it if needed. ----- Original Message ---- From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> To: JAMES SCOTT <skoona at verizon.net> Cc: David Hubbard <david.c.hubbard at gmail.com>; lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:54:16 PM Subject: Re: ABIT IP35 Pro mainboard wrong values from 'sensors' James, Didn't you get my mail? I really believe you are on a dead trail here and that your efforts will be in vane. Repeating myself: Abit usually does not use the sensors of the super io chip (which the w83627dhg is), instead they use their own solution called uguru. There is a driver for this, but the uguru isn't detected by sensors-detect. Try modprobe abituguru3, and then try running sensors again. The abituguru3 driver is only available in kernel 2.6.23 and higher, to install this kernel for F-7 do: yum update --enable-repo=updates-testing kernel After rebooting into the new kernel do modprobe abituguru3 sensors Regards, Hans (the author of the abituguru and abituguru3 drivers) JAMES SCOTT wrote: > See inline comments > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: David Hubbard <david.c.hubbard at gmail.com> > To: James Scott Jr <skoona at verizon.net>; lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:34:54 PM > Subject: Re: ABIT IP35 Pro mainboard wrong values from 'sensors' > > Hi James, > >> I have a system with an Intel Q6600 quad core on a ABit IP35 Pro mainboard, >> using Fedora 7 x64, and lm_sensors-2.10.4-1.fc7. The output from sensors is >> wrong. Is there a preformatted config file for these mainboard somewhere >> that I can find? Or can you give me a hit on what I need to know in order >> to create/adjust one? > > I think you'll need to create one. I haven't seen any emails on the > lm-sensors list about your motherboard. > > Creating a new config file isn't too hard. Look at the man page for > sensors.conf: http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/man/sensors.conf > > You should also have one already (maybe in /etc/sensors.conf) and > reading it is very helpful. > > yes, I have a /etc/sensors.conf with an entry for w83627dhg-isa-*, but not coretemp-isa-* > >> The cpu cores are really in the high 30's, cpu & case fans are not >> present, .... > > I'm looking at the IP32 pro manual, page 11, and I see six fans > (CPUfan1, SYSfan1, AUXfan1-4). The w83627dhg only reads the RPM from 5 > fans, which makes me wonder if your southbridge (possibly an Intel > ICH9) is controlling one fan. Do you have zero fans connected? Or just > one (a CPU fan?). Page 22 of the manual mentions "abit's exclusive > Guru Panel." Do you have a uguru on the motherboard? (I'm not really > familiar with abit's uguru, but there are some other people here on > lm-sensors who know a lot more about it.) > > I have a cpu fan, and case fan in their labeled position. I will be adding a memory cooler fan later in the aux1 fan position. all other positions are empty. No uguru as uguru is a windows app. > > The sensors.conf file we figure out here, for the sake of all IP32 pro > users, should probably not disable the fan input readings and alarms. > But if you want, you can set "ignore" statements for all the fans, so > they don't show up in the sensors output, since you don't have fans > connected to the motherboard. > >> [jscott at vserv ~]$ sensors >> w83627dhg-isa-0290 >> Adapter: ISA adapter > > OK, the above lines are fine. > >> VCore: +1.46 V (min = +1.03 V, max = +1.74 V) >> in1: +8.76 V (min = +11.30 V, max = +2.80 V) ALARM >> AVCC: +3.20 V (min = +2.06 V, max = +0.88 V) ALARM >> 3VCC: +3.20 V (min = +1.87 V, max = +0.58 V) ALARM >> in4: +1.48 V (min = +0.34 V, max = +1.20 V) ALARM >> in5: +1.34 V (min = +1.03 V, max = +1.03 V) ALARM >> in6: +4.28 V (min = +5.99 V, max = +3.30 V) ALARM >> VSB: +3.10 V (min = +3.47 V, max = +2.02 V) ALARM >> VBAT: +0.51 V (min = +0.99 V, max = +2.06 V) ALARM > > It would be really helpful to match these voltages against voltages in > your BIOS. Also, try to find information on what the min and max for > each should be. The most important ones, of course, are VCore, 3VCC, > VBAT, and 12V (which I don't see there). > > I will get those data points later tonight when I get home. I remember VCore being 1.33V though. > > This means that the voltages are not being calculated correctly. This > isn't a surprise. The w83627dhg chip reads voltages, but each > motherboard is wired differently, so the voltage arriving at the 'dhg > pins is never the same. > >> Case Fan: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >> CPU Fan: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >> Aux Fan: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >> fan4: 0 RPM (min = 439 RPM, div = 128) ALARM >> fan5: 0 RPM (min = 81 RPM, div = 128) ALARM > > So it looks like nothing's connected to your fans. We'll just leave > them there for now. > > CPU fan is a 100mm and case fan is a 80mm fan. > >> Sys Temp: +21?C (high = +58?C, hyst = +78?C) >> CPU Temp: +30.0?C (high = -126.0?C, hyst = +75.5?C) >> AUX Temp: -23.0?C (high = +80.0?C, hyst = +75.0?C) > > The temps don't look right. I think coretemp is reporting the right > temperature, and sensors.conf will need to scale the temps it gets > (which are just voltages) to match coretemp. > >> coretemp-isa-0000 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 0: +54?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0001 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 1: +51?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0002 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 2: +49?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0003 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 3: +52?C (high = +100?C) >> >> [jscott at vserv ~]$ >> >> >> >> [jscott at vserv ~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors >> ... >> # >> # Generated by sensors-detect on Fri Oct 19 00:26:53 2007 >> MODULE_0=w83627ehf >> MODULE_1=coretemp >> [jscott at vserv ~]$ > > Well, that's a start. Please reply with information about what chips > you have (you can run 'lspci -n' for that) and look at your BIOS setup > screen for voltages and temperatures. The numbers reported by BIOS > will be the most accurate. We'll try to match those numbers in > sensors. > > HTH, > David > > Ok, thanks. > > I will post the bios temps, speeds, and voltage values, along with my sensors.conf file. I should mention I am planning to use gkrellm; but I need sensors to read right before adjusting it. Question: As I think about the list of ports 'in1, in2, etc' that are contained in the sensors.conf file. How do I determine all the ports available as a starting template - is their a tool that can enum what's available from the chip? before I verify that the correct labels and computes are applied? > > James, > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20071019/218c1950/attachment.html
