Hi Jean,
On 10/19/07, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi Juerg,
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:57:55 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > Update the info for the SMSC LPC47B357 in sensors-detect.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juergh at gmail.com>
>
> > Index: lm-sensors/prog/detect/sensors-detect
> > ===================================================================
> > --- lm-sensors.orig/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2007-10-18 14:54:16.417255000 -0700
> > +++ lm-sensors/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2007-10-18 14:55:16.105166000 -0700
> > @@ -1752,8 +1752,8 @@
> > devid => 0x56,
> > },
> > {
> > - name => "SMSC LPC47B357 Super IO",
> > - # no datasheet
> > + name => "SMSC LPC47B357/M967 Super IO",
> > + driver => "not-a-sensor",
> > devid => 0x5d,
> > },
> > {
>
> Are you sure of yourself? I've found this article:
> http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/roundupmobo/fs-d1627-a-i865pe.html
>
> "System monitoring is supported by the SMSC LPC47M967-NC chip (this
> chip (Hardware Monitor + Super I/O) is rarely used, we happened to see
> it only on Intel and FIC models). It controls:
>
> * processor, AGP bus voltages, +3.3, +5 and +12 V;
> * rotation speed of 2 ordinary fans and one in the power supply
> unit (it requires a special cable connected to the board);
> * temperatures of the processor (built-in sensor), the board
> (built-in sensor) and an external temperature sensor (supplied)."
>
> Could it be that LPC47M967 = LPC47B357 + hardware monitoring?
I received the datasheets for both chips. Both of them advertise
themselves as 0x5d and neither has any HW monitoring capabilities.
Sorry, should have mentioned that in the patch email.
...juerg
> Of course it's also possible that the article is completely wrong...
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
