On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 04:35:30PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:45:44 -0700, Philip Edelbrock wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > lm_sensors-3.0.0-rc1.tar.gz is not signed yet. Phil, do you want to > > > keep signing the archives for the lm-sensors 3 series? If you want to > > > do it, please proceed. If you prefer that I take over, just say so and > > > I'll do it. > > > > If you want to take over the signing, that's perfectly alright to > > me. Might make more sense for you to be doing it anyway. > > OK, I've signed the 3.0.0-rc1 archive. I'll let you sign the few last > 2.10 releases we'll have though. > > BTW, does anyone have an objection to switching to tar.bz2 for the next > 3.0 releases? This seems to be pretty much the standard these days, and > that would save some disk space and bandwidth. Since you copied me explictely on this one: No objections, of course. We're offering bz2 (and not gz) for the automated snapshots already BTW. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20071007/4c63ef38/attachment.bin
