On man, 2007-10-01 at 05:53 -0700, Cress, Andrew R wrote: > Stian, > > I believe the port should be 0xCA2, not 0xCA0. > According to the docs, it does have IPMI support, but it would be only > local (no IPMI LAN). > > Try modprobe ipmi_si type="kcs" addrs="0xca0" > or just modprobe ipmi_si Unfortunately, neither of this works. I've tried root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_si FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such device root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_si type="kcs" ports="0xca0" FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such device root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_si type="kcs" ports="0xca2" FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such device I don't really know if there is more to try. But as you say, the board should support IPMI, so I don't really know why it doesn't seem to. Hmm. I guess it was worth a try :) Thanks to everyone who replied :) Regards, Stian > -----Original Message----- > From: Stian Jordet [mailto:liste at jordet.net] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:58 AM > To: lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > Cc: yani.ioannou at gmail.com; Cress, Andrew R; slava at nsys.by > Subject: IPMI and ipmisensors on an Intel SC450NX > > Hi, > > Sorry, this is going to be long and probably cross-posted too many > places, but it isn't easy to know where to direct this! The persons in > the CC-field I have found after searching on the net, hoping any of them > have some bright ideas! > > I've used the weekend (again!) trying to get sensors working on my good > old Intel SC450NX server, with no luck. > > First of all, I'm not even sure what IPMI version this system has. I > found this mail: > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=74A9A71929931E4096 > 7CA9F27B1D7396014D46A2%40hdsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com > > where an Intel employee thinks it is IPMI 1.0, and either way it should > work with the ipmi_imb emulation driver, which supposedly uses the same > interface as the original Intel Server Manager uses. I'm still afraid it > is IPMI 0.9 I have. > > I have updated both BIOS, BMC and FRUSDR (whatever that is) to the > latest available versions. dmidecode doesn't have any traces of ipmi. > But lm-sensors sensors-detect reports this: > > [...] > Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0... Success! > (confidence 4, driver `ipmisensors') > Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8... No > [...] > > which at least gave me some hope. The ipmisensors page says I need to > use ipmi_si before loading the ipmisensors-module. I then tried loading > some modules... > > root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_si > IPMI System Interface driver. > ipmi_si: Unable to find any System Interface(s) > FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si > (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such > device > > root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_si type="kcs" addrs="0xca0" > IPMI System Interface driver. > ipmi_si: Trying hardcoded-specified kcs state machine at mem address > 0xca0, slave address 0x0, irq 0 > Could not set up I/O space > ipmi_si: Unable to find any System Interface(s) > FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_si > (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si.ko): No such > device > > After applying ipmi_emu.diff from http://openipmi.sf.net, I tried the > earlier promised ipmi_imb driver: > > root at buick:~# modprobe ipmi_imb > ipmi: can't create user -22 > FATAL: Error inserting ipmi_imb > (/lib/modules/2.6.21/kernel/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_imb.ko): Invalid > argument > > Not looking that good... What does "can't create user -22" mean? I found > this in my dmesg: > > pnp: 00:01: ioport range 0xca0-0xca7 has been reserved > > Which gave me hope that pnp was "locking" the ipmi addresses. Booted > with pnpbios=no and pnpacpi=off and even acpi=off, no difference. > > I ran the FRUSDR utility from a boot disk, and got this output: > > a:\>frusdr /p /d fru > > FRU & SDR Load Utility Version 3.4 > > FRU IMBDEVICE on bus FFh, IMB address 20h, LUN 00 > > Display Header Area > Common Header Area (Version 1, Length 8) > Internal Area Offset = 01h > Chassis Area Offset = 1Ah > Board Area Offset = 1Eh > Product Area Offset = 26h > Multirecord Area Offset = 00h > PAD = 00h > CHECKSUM = A0h > > Don't know what any of this means, except it kinda says it does have a > "imbdevice" (Which I had some hopes the ipmi_imb driver would > support...) > > Ok, I found this http://bubble.nsys.by/projects/ipmi/ and this > http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg29983.html on the web, > showing at least two attempts trying to get bmcsensors working with IPMI > 0.9 (if that's what my system has), but I haven't found any sign of > success or not. I am especially curious as to whether Yani's attempt to > make bmcsensors working with IPMI 0.9 will have any effect now that > ipmisensors seems to use ipmi_si and OpenIPMI does not suppoert IPMI > 0.9... > > Anyone have any bright ideas where to look next? Or am I really out of > luck? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Stian >
