On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 07:22:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hmm, > > I see it refresh the readings every 2 seconds, since reading things takes 1 > sec minimum, I think it would be a good idea to make this somewhat bigger. > Darrick, can you post a new version and or an incremental patch with a > slower read frequency, say once every 5 or 10 seconds? Will do. The data sheet says you have to wait 200ms * number_of_temperature_sensor_chips. Unfortunately, there's no way to find out how many sensor chips there are before you read them, but 1s seemed to work ok for all my systems. I suppose I could modify the init function to do the read once with the long delay, then lower it to 200ms * however many temperature sensors read a "sane" value. > Also I notice that you are still doing a full read of the chip to > data->raw, this might very well explain some if the slowness. Please remove > raw[] from data and the full read code from the update() function. That was pulled from v3. --D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070716/9d2cf9b1/attachment.bin
