On Tue, 22 May 2007 11:34:37 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 5/22/07, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:49:26 +0200, Goede, J.W.R. de wrote: > > > Actually keeping a queue that can be used with people which > > > have time to review sounds like a plan. I think we should > > > create a page for this at the trac wiki. Mark AFAIK you've > > > been collecting reviews, can you create such a page. (I can > > > do it myself but I don't have a list of everything that > > > needs reviewing). > > > > This certainly doesn't prevent you from creating such a page. If the > > list is incomplete, it can be completed later, by Mark or others. > > > > Note that I am already trying to maintain > > http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/Devices > > with this information. If you search for "review" on this page, you > > should find most drivers waiting for a review, with a link to the > > latest version that was posted. > > This is actually already pretty close to perfect. What would further > help is another column that shows the assigned reviewer and some way > to indicate the priority/status. Or should we just use the date as the > priority and a link to a ticket for status updates? The concept of priority doesn't hold in our context. Reviews are done on a voluntary basis. There is no central authority to decide and impose which driver review has higher priority. -- Jean Delvare
