Krzysztof Helt wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to port THMC50/ADM1022 driver for 2.6 kernel tree. Where > should I post the patch? > > I sent it one month ago to this list, but it seemed to get ignored. > > I can report that I happily use this driver in the Compaq AP550 > workstation with two ADM1022 chips for over a month now. > > The sensors command does not handle it correctly (lack of board > definition and new 2.6 kernel interface). I can also patch the > sensors command, but I need to have accepted interface to the > chip (pwm1, tempX_input files). > I could review your patch, but that useless as Jean then still wants to review it again himself :( Jean, sorry if I sounded a bit harsh yesterday, but you criticizing a driver you've been ignoring for 3 months brushed my hair the wrong way. With this post, do you see my point now? Now we have 3 drivers awaiting review, and lm93 coming soon. Why won't you accept reviews done by others? Its not like Juerg and I have made it easy on ourselves, we both did a pretty thorough review. Also we're talking about new drivers* here, drivers which won't even get autoloaded, but people need to manually activate. So even if there is a bug, its not like this will cause a regression for existing setups. *new, but tested my driver has been tried by several people without problems. Regards, Hans
