Hi Hans, On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:06:10 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Wouldn't it be wise to target only 3.x / 4.x with the dmi-detect code, and thus > assume dynamic chip support and the new syntax? I haven't been doing much > lm-sensors related work myself lately, but I can make some time free to get the > dyn chip support into the 3.0 branch asap, if that helps the dmi detect code to > become future proof. I think only support 3.x / 4.x is easiest / best otherwise > the code becomes convoluted with compatibility muck from the day it was written. I tend to agree, yeah. The only problem is that I cannot give any timeline for the dyn chip support, as I do not have the time to work on it myself. But if you're going to do it, alright. -- Jean Delvare
