Jasper, please don't send HTML-only e-mails to the lm-sensors list. Jasper Alias wrote: > Agreed we should be able to include both base info and > system info into the system. Maybe we can check the values in > those fields and then let the system decide with of the two > contains the most sensible info and select that info field to > be used. It might be non-trivial to determine which fields contain relevant information and which do not. If the fields are empty it's clear they aren't relevant, but sometimes vendors put random crap in the fields instead, such as "None" or "System Manufacturer" or "To Be Filled By O.E.M.". Anyway, as Hans suggested, we don't really need to find out which fields are most relevant. We can use all four fields as the key to identify the motherboard, if parts of the key aren't meaningful it doesn't really matter. BTW, as the dmidecode maintainer, I have a lot of BIOS ROM images I use for my regression tests. I can provide the system and board manufacturer and product strings for all of them, to complement Rudolf's list, if you are interested. -- Jean Delvare
