Hi Curt, I have tested the w83627ehf.c file from 2.6.21-rc1 in kernels as old as 2.6.17. I have a stock 2.6.16 kernel I could test the driver in, but didn't expect anyone to need it. Is there any way you could upgrade to 2.6.18? That kernel is pretty popular. David On 3/20/07, Curt Blank <Curt.Blank at curtronics.com> wrote: > Well that explains it. In kernel 2.6.21 and I have 2.6.16. > > If I'm reading things right that's not even a stable kernel yet. Any > chance of me being able to backport it to the 2.6.16 w83627ehf driver > for my use? > > Looks like I'm slightly on the bleeding edge. > > -Curt > > Curt Blank wrote: > > >In the meantime.... > > > >Winbond W83627DHG > > > >http://www.curtronics.com/Pics/MSI_K9N4_SLI-F_Winbond.jpg > > > >How's that for Hi-Res. Couldn't use a flash and lighting was a bitch > >(running server). > > > >-Curt > > > >Jan van Tiggelen wrote: > > > > > > > >>OK, the question is out to MSI. I expect it to take up to about a day or 2 > >>before we have the full answer. > >> > >>Will post back to you in a personal message when I get the schematics. > >> > >>Kind regards, > >> > >>Jan van Tiggelen > >> > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Curt Blank [mailto:curt at curtronics.com] > >>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:44 PM > >>To: David Hubbard > >>Cc: Jan van Tiggelen; lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > >>Subject: Re: MSI K9N4 SLI-F sensors-detect says use > >>w83627ehfbut it won't load > >> > >>Jan/David > >> > >>Thanks! Man you guys are great. > >> > >>I built this server so I am familiar with the MB but it sounds like Jan > >>has the answer. > >> > >>I did try installing all the Winbond drivers one at a time but no luck. > >> > >>-Curt > >> > >>On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, David Hubbard wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>Hi Jan, > >>> > >>>On 3/20/07, Jan van Tiggelen <den_tichel at zonnet.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Curt / David, > >>>> > >>>>Would it be of any help if you get a full spec of the motherboard, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>including > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>>the schematics? I have access to that. > >>>> > >>>>That way you don't need to take the server apart, and you can be sure > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>that > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>>the chip is used exactly for what purpose you would expect. > >>>> > >>>>Kind regards, > >>>> > >>>>Jan van Tiggelen > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Yes, that would be the best way. > >>> > >>>David > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >lm-sensors mailing list > >lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > >http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors >
