Hi Hans, Please keep the list in copy... On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 01:24:25 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > I fear we'll have to release 2.10.3 earlier than originally planed. The > > sooner would be the better, in fact. Due to new i2c-core cleanups, > > libsensors needs again to be updated to anticipate the kernel changes > > and give our users (and distributions) a chance to upgrade user-space > > before upgrading their kernel, so they won't break "sensors" and other > > tools. > > > > There is no bugfix pending as far as I know. If anyone thinks something > > in particular needs to be committed before we release 2.10.3, please > > speak up. > > > > Release schedule could look like: > > * March 11th: SVN freeze > > * March 12th-18th: testing > > * March 19th: release > > > > As there was no changes made to the i2c repository since 2.10.2, this > > will be a lm_sensors-release only (not that it makes much difference > > anyway). > > What about the: > -dynamic sysfs chip support > -get_sensor_type addition > -generic print suppoty in sensors the program > > A previous group of my students has been worming on, any chance some of > those could make it, or maybe that we can start looking at them after > the 19th? I discussed this with Mark M. Hoffman and we agreed that this was lm-sensors 3.0 material. Mark is more or less in charge of the lm-sensors 3.0 tree, while I'm taking care of the current "stable" branch (2.10.x) > Either way I'll give those students a kick telling them to get moving on > getting their work presented here and integrated. I agree that we are not very fair with your students which apprently made a good job which we fail unfortunately failed to integrate quickly. But well I can't work on everything at once, sorry. If you want write access to the SVN repository to do it yourself, fine with me, just ask. -- Jean Delvare
