Jean Delvare wrote: >>> OK. Attached is a patch against sensors-detect from our SVN repository. >>> Please give it a try, it should detect your DS75. Compared to the LM75 >>> detection, I removed the cycle-over-8 test as your kernel patch did, >>> and additionally I'm checking that registers 0x08 to 0x0f behave the >>> same as 0x04 to 0x07 (which isn't true of the LM75.) If it works OK for >>> you, we can use the same approach in the lm75 kernel driver. Please >>> report. >> (...) >> Your sensors detect patch works fine: > > OK, patch applied to lm-sensors SVN. > > I'm still waiting for updated kernel and libsensors/sensors patches. It is on my todo list still - been side tracked by some other things so don't expect it until next week. Sorry. I'm not going to try for >9 bit precision. An interesting side effect of running i2cdump is to change it from 9 bit precision (which it shows it is setup for the first time it is run after a reset) to the dump that you saw in my earlier mail. Odd. (Which is why the kernel patch I posted earlier did work for me). Alan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: alanc.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 562 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20070215/49f271af/attachment.vcf
