======= On Thursday 04 January 2007 06:34, you wrote: ======= ... >coretemp is measured at the hottest part of the core, while >motherboard will tend to measure the surface temperature. A few >degrees difference is expected. Also that's a really nice temperature >for coretemp, perhaps you have really frigid air conditioning. My >overclocked Core2Duo (@3.4 GHz) runs coretemps of 51C idle and up to >60C under full load... which is a huge improvement from my old Athlon >MPs which were 56-65C surface temperature. [OT] My aim is a silence rather an overclocking ;-) So I have set Zalaman 9500 to ~1550 rpm (all fans noise are below Samsung HDD noise now). [T] OK, I can conclude, coretemp's temps are more "honest", as expected - closer to cores - closer to truth. >I made a patch for KSensors, I don't use SysGuard. It seems like KSensors project is not under development now :-( At any case I'll try it with your patch, thanks!
