On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:06:38AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Why? It's infrastructure basically. Anyway. Is it possible to have > something like > depends I2C=AMS || I2C=y > If we stuck that into the i2c AMS version that'd help. Though be really > ugly for the user since she might get the AMS I2C version only after > selecting AMS as a module then. Pretty icky, all that. I'm not really a fan of it. Is there anything wrong with my proposed patch? Thanks, Michael
