Hi, On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:55:22AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > We now have two different pairs of repositories for our i2c and > lm_sensors development trees: the old CVS ones and the new Subversion > ones. This is a bit confusing as to where we are supposed to commit our > changes. CVS is still the production repo, trac & svn are in testing phase. > So I'd suggest that we all switch to using the new Subversion > repositories for development. If possible, we could turn the (i2c and > lm_sensors2) CVS repositories read-only so as to make sure that nobody > commits there anymore. Well, I haven't received even one ssh key for enabling svn write access :/ > I will be checking all patches which just went into Linux 2.6.15-git3 > and backport everything which needs to be, so I'd like a decision to be > taken quickly, before I do. I'd hate my work to be lost in a repository > resync. I suggest to commit to CVS, then decide on what to migrate to svn and whether the chosen paths are OK that way. (Re)migrating from CVS to svn isn't an issue. > BTW, do we really need a Subversion repository for the 7 year old > lm_sensors (not 2) project? Having it hanging around is probably adding > to confusion, and I see no benefit in even mentionning it on our new > website. So I'd suggest that we don't convert this repository to > Subversion at all, and that we drop all references to it. OK. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20060107/740e2d03/attachment.bin
