Salut Michel, On 2005-07-11, Michel Bouissou wrote: > So they asked me to bug you ;-)) And quite rightly so, this is indeed not acceptable that sensors -s has to be ran twice. Unfortunately your report isn't as complete as it would need to be for us to help you. We would need to know: * Which version of the Linux kernel you are using. * If this kernel has patches applied which could affect the i2c subsystem or the it87 driver, we need to know which they are and what they do. * Which version of "sensors" and "libsensors" you are using. * If lm_sensors has patches applied, we need a list. * What is your it87-compatible chip? IT8705? IT87012F? Which revision, if you happen to know? Is it accessed through the SMBus or as an ISA device? * The complete sensors initialization script used. * Which limits exactly don't get set by the first "sensors -s"? All? Please provide the output of "sensors" before the first "sensors -s", after the first "sensors -s" and after the second "sensors -s". * Anything in the logs? Please keep in mind that this is *expected* that reported alarms won't disappear immediately after changing the limits. You will always see them once after that, per chip design (you must not miss once-only alarms). > (BTW the sensors at stimpy.netroedge.com email address mentioned on the > http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/~lm78/support.html web page bounces with "User > unknown"...) Correct, I just asked our administrator to fix it. Thanks for reporting. -- Jean Delvare
