On 5/23/05, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > No, not all i2c chip drivers are hardware monitoring monitors. At least > the following should stay in drivers/i2c/chips: > * ds1337 > * eeprom > * isp1301_omap (what is this BTW?) > * m41t00 > * pcf8574 > * pcf8591 > * rtc8564 Ah, yes you are right of course. I have no idea what isp1301_omap is :), but I'd have to say that about the majority of stuff in i2c. > > (...) and perhaps > > drivers/i2c/bus to drivers/i2c (although the latter isn't necessary, > > it just makes sense to me). > > I don't this it is a good idea. The current scheme makes it clear which > drivers create i2c busses, which are i2c chip drivers, which are > algorithms and which are core drivers. I wouldn't change that. My thought was more a removal of a redundancy, but since there will still be some i2c/chips as you point out it doesn't make much sense. I guess I'll have a little look into things myself, see how I'd go about making bmcsensors independent from i2c on its own for now. Thanks, Yani
