Hi Grant, > Can I go kill some macros too? Silly conversion macros, make like > adm9240? Was planning to put SCALING() in with SENSORS_LIMIT() in > the header somewhere, as those two static functions can be used for > most of the scaling conversions. Macros that do not actually improve the code readability are candidates to removal, as they additionally slow down the preprocessing. Removing macros is not a goal per se though, most of them are actually helpful. > As well, do something with the LM75 include, I see now I duplicated > some of the code there, with exception that I right justify signed > 9-bit temp on read to local store, rather than on delivery to sysfs. If you can refactor some code with no side effect, this is welcome. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
