Hi Khali, On Sun, 8 May 2005 21:50:26 +0200, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: >> vid reports 2.8V while this CPU uses 1.4 / 1.1 V (for 1800 / 1000 MHz) > >Have you tried changing VRM? A month ago you wrote: >I would like to insist on this. The fact that vrm is writable is a legacy >of the past. There is no more reason to set the vrm value now that >Rudolf Marek added auto-detection stuff (which BTW should be ported back >to lm_sensors CVS). > >Even exporting the VRM version to user-space makes little sense now. This >now only serves for debugging, but this would be more efficient to >simply print the VRM value in the logs at the moment we detect it. > >-- >Jean Delvare > So I should scratch the vid/vrm change from TODO list? --Grant.
