Greg has asked me to send it in-line to the list, so here it is :). I'd appreciate any comments on the patch, please read the previous threads on the sysfs callback problem first though. Thanks, Yani ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Yani Ioannou <yani.ioannou at gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:39:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH 2.6] bmcsensors To: Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> Sorry I was following this section of Documentation/SubmittingPatches, the patch uncompressed is ~75K: -----------------------Documentation/SubmittingPatches----------------------------- 210 Large changes are not appropriate for mailing lists, and some 211 maintainers. If your patch, uncompressed, exceeds 40kb in size, 212 it is preferred that you store your patch on an Internet-accessible 213 server, and provide instead a URL (link) pointing to your patch. I've attached it in line below, sorry for any inconvenience. Thanks, Yani On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:31:53 -0800, Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:24:21PM -0500, Yani Ioannou wrote: > > Sorry Greg, didn't realize I had to CC you :). > > I need the patch in an email, as per Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > > You should send the patch to the list too, don't expect people to pull > it from a web site. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-linux-2.6.11.5-bmcsensors.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 76104 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050330/0572e179/attachment.bin
