On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 07:28:56PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I just noticed a nasty bug in the way the "force" parameter is handled > for non-sensors i2c chip drivers. The "force" parameter supposedy is a > list of adapter, address *pairs* where supported chips are > unquestionably assumed to be. However, after handling one pair, the i2c > core code searches for the next one *three* values later, not two. So > with the current code, the second and third pairs wouldn't be properly > handled. The fourth one would be, and so on. > > As a side note, this questions the need of an array parameter handling > up to 24 of such pairs, when obviously nobody ever required more than > one for the past 6 years. > > Please apply, Applied, thanks. greg k-h
