Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Chunaho, > > >>It seems that no device is at address 0x58. I attached the >>/proc/ioports In this mail, please check it. > > > 0x58 would be an I2C address, not an I/O address. Also, as I said in an > earlier post, this would certainly be 0x58 >> 1, i.e. 0x44. > 0x58 >> 1 == 44 == 0x2c, not 0x44
