Hi Phil, On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:30:27PM -0800, Philip Edelbrock wrote: > On Dec 12, 2004, at 8:50 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > If we are going to put any effort in having a better mailing-list > > archive (not that I have to complain about Andrew's one BTW, it > > does the job), we might as well go for a real mailing-list with > > integrated archiving (such as Mailman). Either Phil could do it if > > he has some time and energy to put in it, or we might accept the > > Axel Thimm's offer [1]. > > > > Maybe there would be more developers joining the project if it > > were easier to join our mailing-list than curently is. > > > > Just my $0.02 though. > > > > [1] http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg27967.html > > > > I'm open to any option which is going to help the project. At some > point I was hoping to get a piece of (reasonable) dedicated hardware > that could be the lm-sensors project server (cvs or svn, web, mail > server, etc.). Then roll in a list server (Mailman looks good). My > company is perfectly willing to be the home of the hardware and > share the bandwidth. Would you be interested in joining forces for creating the required infrastructure for lm_sensors (and anyone else who wants to invest time in administrative parts instead of coding ;)? I have everything running and recreating new instances for lm_sensors would be rather easy. Does lm_sensors.org sound good? It is not yet taken (sensors.org is). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20041213/1421c520/attachment.bin
