On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 03:45:48PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > If the checksumming was that important, I guess it would have been the > default, which it was not. If it is there for the sole purpose of > allowing the user to prevent the eeprom driver from taking over > non-eeprom chips, then the "ignore" module parameter can be used to > achieve the same effect, faster, plus it is configurable on a > per-address basis, while the checksum parameter isn't. I agree, what's wrong with using the ignore stuff instead? thanks, greg k-h
