On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:22:34AM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote: > Hi, > > On 24.09.2004 02:02, Greg KH wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:41:31PM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote: > > > >>Please have a look and tell me what you think. The big problem will be, > >>that we cannot test all configurations, so it's possible that some > >>devices won't be recognized anymore, because the .class entries don't > >>match. > > >I like the patches. If you get them in a state you like (and drop the > >printk(), and use dev_dbg() instead), > > Ok. > > >and send them 1 patch per file > >with the Signed-off-by: line, I'll be glad to apply them. > > I'll re-create them against 2.6.9-rc2-mm2. > > Do you really mean one patch per file, ie. about 50 separate patches? (I > don't care, I simply write a script that splits them up) Sorry, I ment one email per patch (you sent more than one patch in that email.) thanks, greg k-h
