Rudolf Marek wrote: >>The spec I have (under NDA, sorry) looks like some very coarse >>documentation done in a midday break :( > > > I'm just curious how did you solved the that they allow you to provide > source code? Our project under GPL so your source code must be available > for anyone on demand. No. The source code must be made available _to anyone to whom he provides a (modified) binary version_. http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCDevelopChangesUnderNDA "Does the GPL allow me to develop a modified version under a nondisclosure agreement? Yes. For instance, you can accept a contract to develop changes and agree not to release your changes until the client says ok. This is permitted because in this case no GPL-covered code is being distributed under an NDA. You can also release your changes to the client under the GPL, but agree not to release them to anyone else unless the client says ok. In this case, too, no GPL-covered code is being distributed under an NDA, or under any additional restrictions. The GPL would give the client the right to redistribute your version. In this scenario, the client will probably choose not to exercise that right, but does have the right." -- Cory T. Tusar Embedded Systems Engineer Videon Central, Inc. 2171 Sandy Drive State College, PA 16801 (814) 235-1111 x316 (814) 235-1118 fax "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." --Brian W. Kernighan
