WOOOHOOO sensors lm85-i2c-0-2e Adapter: SMBus I801 adapter at d800 V1.5: +1.51 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +3.32 V) VCore: +1.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +2.99 V) V3.3: +3.28 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +4.38 V) V5: +5.10 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +6.64 V) V12: +12.00 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +15.94 V) CPU_Fan: 2186 RPM (min = 0 RPM) CPU: +47 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C) Board: +38 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C) Remote: +37 C (low = -127 C, high = +127 C) CPU_PWM: 77 Fan2_PWM: 77 Fan3_PWM: 77 vid: +1.850 V (VRM Version 9.1) i did modprobe i2c-i801 modprobe lm85 force=0,0x2e together with mounting /sys All my servers i made with 2.6.x only my workstation was upgraded from 2.4.x to 2.6.x so i never missed /sys until today ;) this is great many thanks ovis On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Confirmed SMSC EMC6D103 !!!! > > > > on a photo of the mobo on the web there was a > > ADM1027 > > Since both chips are compatible, I guess intel use whatever they have at hand > at the moment. > > Anyway the story is quiet easy to understand now. > > 1* The "no response" errors in the logs are for the other possible addresses > of LM85-compatible chips (0x2c and 0x2d). That's not what your chip uses so > the bus cannot read from these addresses. Nothing wrong. > > 2* The lm85 driver in Linux 2.6 doesn't support SMSC chips, although the 2.4 > driver does. Using force=0,0x2e should work in the meantime. The original post > suggests you tried and it didn't, but the log right after that says "found > normal i2c entry for adapter 0, addr 2e" so I doubt it worked, you must have > missed something. Just try again. > > At some time, the SMSC support should be ported from the 2.4 driver, and > extended to the 103 and maybe 102 as well if they are compatible (and they > seem to be but I don't know the LM85 family that good). > > -- > Jean Delvare > http://khali.linux-fr.org/ > >
