> > Original message from: Bert.gevers at belgacom.net > > To sensors at stimpy.netroedge.com > > > I got the adm9240 to work with a 2.6.7 kernel (custom build debian), > > but there are still errors and I thought that maybe you could use > > some feedback on this. > > > Kconfig, Makefile and adm9240.c are from > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/i2c/chips/. Aha. We *never* got the part below on the list. Your message was truncated here. No attachement either. Something must have gone wrong at the moment you sent your mail. This is why I was surprised about what your mail was for. You should not use Outlook, see how bad it is ;) > > Adm9240.c came from solar.xs4all.nl/sensors/ (as most of the things > > came from there). > > Chips.c is the change in the lm-sensors2.8.7 driver from your site. > > It was based on solar.xs4all.nl but contained some errors (in my > > humble opinion). > > > After installation, I get the following info: > > Sensors -v: Sensorsversion > > Sensors adm9240-i2c-1-2d: sensorsoutputknown > > > Sensors -u adm9240-i2c-1-2d: Sensorsoutput Care to resend all the files? Please let us know what you fixed from Michiel's files. > > Things that are still wrong: > > * 2.5V is on the intel se440bx-2 only 1.5V. According to the doc, it really does monitor +1.5V: "* Voltage sense (+12 V, -12 V, +5 V, -5 V, +3.3 V, +1.5 V, and VCCP) to detect out of range values" so it's OK. Just edit the label. > > * (I dunnot understand the difference between Vccp1 and 2 but that > > seems all right) Vccp2 is meant for dual-CPU system (or maybe dual-plane CPUs, but it only existed for a short time). It may be used for something different on your board (it even must be, since there's no VCCP2 in Intel's list). > > * fans are correct (fan 1 is in fact not the cpu, but the case fan > > which isn't present) Again, simply edit the label. > > temperature is correct except for the hysteresis temp which is a > > factor 100 too big I saw several magnitude problems in Michiel's files. Don't know what you fixed or not. > > analog out isn't configured (and I dunnot understand what the > > meaning of this can be) I don't know either, I guess we can ignore that. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/
