VRM(VRD) detection versus CPUID

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:28:47PM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote:
> > Tested.
> 
> Thanks
> >
> > So it's working fine for me, isn't it? :)
> seems so :)
> 
> Any ideas how to implement the which_vrm function to lm_sensors ?
> 
> 21:06 < Khali> hmm I don't know exactly
> 21:06 < Khali> there are several options
> 21:07 < Khali> inline function in sensor_vid
> 21:07 < Khali> or regular function in i2c-proc/i2c_sensor
> 21:07 < ruik> which is better ?
> 21:07 < Khali> or new module sensor_vid, replacing the header file
> 21:08 < ruik> its too small to be in module?
> 21:08 < Khali> yes it's a bit small
> 21:08 < Khali> sounds a bit overkill
> 21:08 < Khali> but I'm not sure
> 21:08 < Khali> maybe we should ask other people what they think
> 21:08 < Khali> especially Greg
> 21:09 < Khali> and mds maybe
> 21:09 < ruik> will you :) ?
> 21:09 < Khali> no :p
> 
> So I'm asking :)
> 
> What are your ideas ?

What is your proposal for how to do it?  :)

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux