Jean Delvare escribi?: >>Sensors-detect tells me I have a rev.1 chip: >>Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.1)'... Success! >> (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49 >>Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.2)'... Failed! >> >> > >OK... The one I tested on was rev.2, so both must be the same for PWM. > > I think i've read of rev.2 PWM too so they must be the same. > > >>i2cdump tells me that the default value for 0x59 is 0x8f (without >>having touched it since bootup) >> >> > >I *think* I remember it waas 0x9f for me. > > Could've perfectly been that, at least it seems to have the same effect. We might have to study bit 0x10 though. > > >>BTW, I didn't mention 0x83 before, it's just an intermediate value, >>say 70% speed. >> >> > >You *did* mention it actually. > > Heh I didn't look back thoroughly enough. > > >>My real name is H?ctor, I had my new accounts half set-up still and >>that's why you got that From: name. I'll be sending email from this >>account from now on. I don't like my nick on things like this, it >>makes me feel that people are going to think that I'm afraid to say my >>name or something heh heh. >> >> > >No problem, I prefer it that way too. I've updated the file. > > > Thanks ;) >>Please tell me your results with these and other values, so we can >>make some tests to find out what exactly does what. >> >> > >My own as99127f is a rev.1 and PWM doesn't seem to be wired on my board. >The successful tests were on another board which doesn't belong to me >and to which I have no access anymore, sorry. > >In any case I'm not really motivated to work on undocumented chips >anymore. There's more than enough work on documented ones... > > > Yeah, undocumented stuff makes me wonder... If we bought a product, we should have access to it's specifications, shouldn't we? Anyways if I ever get to work on some kernel drivers I might give it a look, contributing something never harms ;) and since I can work little on documented ones (since I haven't got them to test them) there's little else I can do. >Thanks. > > > No problem, I really wanted PWM since sometimes the fan just really drives me crazy (especially my old fan) so I started some investigation on it.
