> Sensors-detect tells me I have a rev.1 chip: > Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.1)'... Success! > (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49 > Probing for `Asus AS99127F (rev.2)'... Failed! OK... The one I tested on was rev.2, so both must be the same for PWM. > i2cdump tells me that the default value for 0x59 is 0x8f (without > having touched it since bootup) I *think* I remember it waas 0x9f for me. > BTW, I didn't mention 0x83 before, it's just an intermediate value, > say 70% speed. You *did* mention it actually. > My real name is H?ctor, I had my new accounts half set-up still and > that's why you got that From: name. I'll be sending email from this > account from now on. I don't like my nick on things like this, it > makes me feel that people are going to think that I'm afraid to say my > name or something heh heh. No problem, I prefer it that way too. I've updated the file. > Please tell me your results with these and other values, so we can > make some tests to find out what exactly does what. My own as99127f is a rev.1 and PWM doesn't seem to be wired on my board. The successful tests were on another board which doesn't belong to me and to which I have no access anymore, sorry. In any case I'm not really motivated to work on undocumented chips anymore. There's more than enough work on documented ones... Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/
