> The change stems from naming change in the ARM port to the IXP4xx. > The original code had various variables, macros, and functions named > ixp425_, ixp42x_, and ixp4xx_. All these were cleaned up to be > ixp4xx instead since the port works on all CPUs in that family. I understood that. > W/O these changes, the I2C driver will not build (actually, it won't > even appear as an options) once the ARM bits are pushed upstream. I had not realized that the changes to the i2c bus driver were not independant from the other changes, sorry. > You can see the latst IXP4xx patch @ > ftp://source.mvista.com/pub/ds-patches/patch-2.6.4-ds1.gz Well, that patch doesn't sound very informative to me. The i2c-ixp42x.c driver is already in 2.6.5 so the relevant patch would be against 2.6.5, not 2.6.4. BTW, don't you intend to rename i2c-ixp42x.c to i2c-ixp4xx.c as well? -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
