> But I wouldn't change current behaviour, as packagers know how to > work around this and users will certainly forget to issue a depmod if > it isn't done automatically. Well, Peter was proposing to remove the depmod call only if DESTDIR is set. It makes sense if the depmod is of no use for packagers, or even bugs them. The only special case I could think of is the cross-installation I was mentionning in my previous post, but this is a rare case and people in that case are likely to be used to run depmod by themselves with the correct options. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
