> Well looking at the log I find this :- > > ----------------------------------- > > Client found at address 0x54 > Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success! > (confidence 1, driver `eeprom') > Client found at address 0x55 > Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success! > (confidence 1, driver `eeprom') > Client found at address 0x56 > Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success! > (confidence 1, driver `eeprom') > Client found at address 0x57 > Probing for `SPD EEPROM'... Success! > (confidence 1, driver `eeprom') > Probing for `Sony Vaio EEPROM'... Failed! > Client found at address 0x5c Probably an AT24RF08 chip... (In other words: I won't white-list your system, at least not now. Sorry.) > Driver `eeprom' (should be inserted): > Detects correctly: > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x50 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 1) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x51 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x52 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x53 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 8) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x54 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 1) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x55 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 1) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x56 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 1) > * Bus `SMBus I801 adapter at fe00' (Algorithm unavailable) > Busdriver `i2c-i801', I2C address 0x57 > Chip `SPD EEPROM' (confidence: 1) Admittedly strange. Do you have 4 memory slots used out of 4 total? Another possibility would be that this is a 24RF16 chip, but it doesn't seem to even exist. > I'm happy to test the adm1025 driver, I think this is actually the > only one I was using under 2.4. I probably still have a 2.4 kernel > around that I could boot into if that would help? Well, the driver is supposed to work on 2.4 already, so what will need testing is the 2.6 port once I am done with it. I do have an evaluation board for the ADM1025 but it requires the same power supply unit as my adsl router does, so I don't much like using it ;) -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
