Hi, On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:19:09PM -0500, Mark Studebaker wrote: > Even better is a patch that adds exactly what was added > in kernel 2.5.34; that is, > it puts all the detection logic in arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c and > simply exports is_unsafe_smbus. > > Jean Delvare wrote: > >>>What would an acceptable name be? The bugzilla reporter suggested > >>>prepending "i2c-" to the two files. > >> > >>Sounds good to me. > > > > > >Blah. I should have read the rest of the thread before replying. Mark's > >approch sounds much better (I really should have thought of it too, > >shame on me). > > > >So, we have to make some changes to mkpatch so that it: > >1* Doesn't include our dmi_scan. > >2* Patches the kernel one. > > > >1 is trivial, and 2 should not be too hard. I'd like to reroll RHL & FC kernels (2.4.20 and 2.4.22 based), and fix also the dmi_scan issue. Has any of the above suggestions found its way into i2c CVS (I'd love a http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/devel/i2c/ patch :)? Or should I use one of the less favoured, but easier (for me) to implement solutions (renaming files)? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040404/85b994a8/attachment.bin
