On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 08:27:01PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Ah, in digging through the change log entries I found the following: > > (...) > > So this was a video developer's request. Does that help explain it a > > bit more now? > > This at leasts explain how it came in here with neither you nor I > knowing why. Heh, well the patch did go though me to Linus, so I can't claim complete ignorance :) > This also suggests that we should leave classes in place. And if other > people use it, we should do as well, for the sake of consistency. Agreed. > So, from now on, I suggest: > * Renaming I2C_ADAP_CLASS_SMBUS to I2C_ADAP_CLASS_SENSORS (unless > someone prefers another name). > * All chip driver check for the bus being of this class. > * All bus driver known to host sensors get this class. > > I'll submit a patch doing all that if nobody objects. That sounds good to me. thanks, greg k-h
