ok, I've checked in something basic. Feel free to enhance either looks or content :) Jean Delvare wrote: >>I'm thinking it would be a good idea to have a separate page that >>we keep current with help and info about 2.6 kernels; >>we're getting a lot of the same questions over and over. >>What do you guys think? > > > Agreed. Now that more and more drivers are ported to 2.6 (which is a > good thing) but some of them still have caveats (which isn't that good), > such a page would help. > > Random ideas of things we could mention of the page: > > 1* Which version of lm_sensors to use with each version of the Linux 2.6 > kernel. > > 2* Which drivers exist in each version of Linux 2.6, which ports are in > progress. > > 3* Known problems with ported drivers. > > This could also be the place for a call to fingers for porting chip > drivers. While almost all bus drivers have been ported, only 25% of chip > drivers have been. I will be working on adm1025 soon, and I know we have > people working on vt1211 and bt869 (possibly waiting for some input from > me, I apologize). Some other drivers would be really needed (I think in > particular of lm80 and w83627hf, which various users have been crying > for). >
