sounds fine to me Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, > > Wouldn't make it sense to add a column "first in Linux 2.X.Y" to our > drivers web pages? Most users now won't really care about versions of > lm_sensors (as far as drivers are concerned; user-space is a completely > different matter), but will be interested in linux versions. > > OTOH, I wonder if the "mkpatched" column is worth the place it wastes. I > don't think people really care, and the same information is easily > available from mkpatch/FILES. What's more, the fact that a driver is > mkpatched depends on the version (yeah, I think I remember that I'm the > one who removed this information, I know). All drivers should be > mkpatched anyway. I don't see any reason to exclude drivers from > mkpatch. > > So basically I propose to replace the "mkpatched" column with a "first > in Linux 2.X.Y" column. >
